4: Contemporary Art Concepts
Maya Deren’s 1943 work Meshes of the Afternoon presents a world of double-meaning. While the film is over 13 minutes, the time passed in the movie is not clear. As the viewer, we see the same scenes multiple times, a layering of the story. Slight variations occur each time and ask us to question reality. Are we observing this looping and progressively deteriorating nightmare or are we participating in it?
In the first scene, the stage is set for the future horror. The dropped key is an early sign that all is not right. After seeing the key inserted in the door, the interior shot of the knife, stuck in the bread then falling to the table, creates a connection between the objects. Extreme close-ups alert the viewer to the upcoming significance of these objects. Deren’s use of the ordinary in this key, knife, a flower, telephone, and record player presents a domestic nightmare.
The knife and the key continue to appear, switching back and forth, as the nightmare replays. A shot of the key coming from the woman’s mouth as the sequence unravels is unnerving. While the similarity between the mouth and the earlier image of the lock is clear, it suggests further horror. In the next iteration, will it be the knife that is coming out of her mouth?
The scenes becoming increasing frantic and frightening as they cycle again. The woman becomes a spider, floating around, observing herself asleep in the chair, and further disruptions in her domestic life. The hooded mirror person returns, as do more copies of herself, shadows of figures, and a man. Has the man invaded her subconscious vision to help or to hurt? Some of the versions of the woman are powerful, commanding, even if they wield a knife near the throat or projecting from the chest. Others are passive, scared, and unable to control themselves, as if drugged or dreaming. She watches helplessly, both as outsider and participant, as her world spirals out of control.
The knife in her bed signifies violent intimacy. Her goggled self takes the knife to her sleeping self, but transforms into the kiss of the man. He fixes the disruptions in her home, putting the phone back on the receiver. The scenes echo back to the beginning. His face is seen in a mirror. Is he a welcome addition to her home? Can he be trusted? Her nightmare, meshed together during an afternoon nap, suggests otherwise. But in the end, he is the figure finding the flower outside, using the key, opening the door, noticing the disturbance in the house, and finding her broken body asleep in the chair.
_
Xu Bing 徐冰 is a Chinese artist working in the international art scene. A child of a professor and librarian, he spent much of his childhood among books at Peking University. “In his work, the artist uses tradition to subvert culture, recasting the cultural meaning and the authority of language” (http://www.artistsrespond.org/artists/xu/). His early work was an exploration of his native language, creating “characters” that look familiar and follow traditional Chinese forms, but are illegible, verbal nonsense. The formal investigations are not able to be read and do not attempt to signify any word. While much of his work involves printmaking and calligraphy, traditional media in Chinese art, it is not bound by one medium. Instead, the hybridity of his work is characteristic of contemporary art, as expressed by Gude in “Postmodern Principles: In Search of a 21st Century Art Education.” Monkeys Grasp for the Moon, 2001, draws on calligraphy, paper cutting, and sculpture to create a 90 ft installation. Contemporary storytelling, the artwork explores a traditional Chinese fable in the multicultural setting. Xu creates concrete poems from the word “monkey” in many languages; the forms of the words visually communicate a monkey’s body, whether or not the viewer is literate in the language. This interaction of text and image is not about juxtaposing two disparate ideas, but a redundancy in image and word.
Square Calligraphy Classroom, 1994, is an interactive installation. At first glance, the characters in Xu’s world appear foreign. The participant views it as other. While gazing at the other is often a Western-imposed relationship of power and judgment, the view Xu presents leaves Westerners powerless, illiterate, and an outsider. Some might begin to belittle the “nonsense” of such a language, but slowly Xu lets you into his secret: The other is not as foreign as you think. New English Calligraphy is his system for writing English words in the square calligraphy style of the Chinese language. In this world, the text and image are interwoven into one visual experience that appropriates Chinese tools, techniques, and style to recontextualizes the familiar word. “As people attempt to recognize and write these words, some of the thinking patterns that have been ingrained in them since they learned to read are challenged. It is the artists' belief that people must have their routine thinking attacked in this way. While undergoing this process of estrangement and re-familiarization with one's written language, the audience is reminded that the sensation of distance between other systems of language and one's own is largely self-induced” (from the artist’s website). Xu uses this system to write anything from children’s nursery rhymes to Western family names. The more familiar the content, the stronger the reaction when the viewer is able to decode the seemingly other into the language of their culture.
Assignment: Analyze Maya Deren’s 1943 experimental film "Meshes of the Afternoon" in terms of contemporary art concepts. Next select a contemporary artwork and discuss the work using contemporary art concepts.
References:
http://www.sensesofcinema.com/2002/great-directors/deren-2/
http://www.artistsrespond.org/artists/xu/
Gude, O. (2004). Postmodern principles: In search of a 21st century art education, Art Education, 57(1), 6-14.
http://www.xubing.com/index.php
http://www.asia.si.edu/exhibitions/online/xubing/default.html
Film Still: http://www.sensesofcinema.com/2002/great-directors/deren-2/
Monkey Image: http://www.asia.si.edu/exhibitions/online/xubing/default.html
Classroom Images: http://www.xubing.com/index.php/site/projects/year/1994/square_calligraphy_classroom
Gender Signs: http://www.echinaart.com/Advisor/xubing/adv_xubing_gallery04.htm




Steph,
I have to admit I was a little disturbed by the film. I had to watch several times to try to grasp what was happening and for what reasons. About how many times did you watch? I watched it 3 times. I too thought the key coming out of her mouth was odd. What did it mean? I like your idea of perhaps the knife would be coming out next... it changed several times with the key. Good idea. I never thought of that one.
Steve -
The film is definitely dark. I think I watched it two times, maybe three. I watched it once, then did some reading about Deren (including the senses of cinema post that Karen linked). When I went to watch it again, I was having troubles loading it so I watched it about a minute at a time over the course of an hour or more (gotta love the internet here...). I did rewatch a few parts after it loaded. The readings helped make sense of some of the symbolism, but I think it is meant to be ambiguous and unsettling.
I don't know that I have a concise way to explain the key coming from her mouth. I am not sure there are simple explanations for the film and its many layers. But as for this small part, I think it is because mouth is an entryway, like the door is the entrance to the house. (Interestingly, the Chinese character for mouth, kou 口, is also used in many words for different types of entrances and exits.) I think the scene mirrors the beginning scene of using the key to unlock the house. It helps strengthen the metaphor where the house is an extension of her body, herself.
Hi Steph and Steve,
I also found the film very disturbing--especially the music. Do you notice how scary parts in films are often made more so by their scores? I think this definitely plays into the "not knowing" and "hybridity" principles described by Gude.
-March
March -
So true! It's described as a "silent film" but the eery music truly creates the mood and emphasizes the visual.
I bought the soundtrack to The Phantom of the Opera when I was in high school. I used to listen to different CDs when I went to sleep but QUICKLY learned that I should never listen to that soundtrack while trying to sleep. Too terrifying.